kim liong - The right to confront and crossexamine thrist a witness is a fundamental requirement of criminal justice Kim Liong v People23 states The right to confront and crossexamine witnesses is a basic fundamental human right vested inalienably to an accused VISUAL ARTIST CHEW KIM LIONG NAFA Petitioner Vs Vs Respondent Third Division PDF Scribd 1st set of Remedial Law Case Digests Academiaedu Read the summary and case digests for Liong vs People in 3 minutes or less and find relevant and cited cases Sign up now to get free credits This document summarizes a Supreme Court decision regarding a defendants right to crossexamine a prosecution witness Specifically The defendant Kim Liong was charged with estafa for failing to return money erroneously deposited in his bank account The first prosecution witness Antonio Dela Rama testified in 20062007 but the defendant failed to crossexamine him due to multiple ALCOM Change in Boardroom DATO ENG KIM LIONG Kim Liong v People PDF PDF Cross Examination D E C I S I O N LEONEN J The right to confront and crossexamine an adverse witness is a basic fundamental constitutional right However this is personal to the accused who can waive the right This resolves the Petition for Review on Certiorari1 assailing the October 7 2011 Decision2 and February 20 2012 Resolution3 of the Court of Appeals in CAGR SP No 113152 The Court of Jan 3 2023 Alcom Berhad has confirmed the resignation of its executive director Dato Eng Kim Liong in its Bursa filing Dato Eng cites that we would want to pursue personal interests as his reasons for leaving the group He has over thirty 30 years of experience in property investment and mechanical and electrical trades 6 Liong vs People PDF Confrontation Clause Witness 1 Liong was charged with estafa for failing to return 5095570 that was erroneously deposited in his bank account 2 The direct examination of the prosecutions witness Antonio Dela Rama was completed in January 2007 but his crossexamination was repeatedly postponed with the defense lawyer often failing to appear in court 3 In August 2009 with the defense lawyer again absent the KIM LIONG Petitioner vs PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES Respondent D E C I S I O N LEONEN J The right to confront and crossexamine an adverse witness is a basic fundamental constitutional right However this is personal to the accused who can waive the right GR No 200630 Kim Liong vs People jurph Dec 31 2022 Dato Eng Kim Liong resigned as the Executive Director and a Director of Alcom Group Berhad on 31 December 2022 This announcement is dated 3 January 2023 Announcement Info The Court of Appeals found no grave abuse of discretion in the issuance of the Orders dated August 27 2009 4 and February 9 2010 5 of Branch 44 Regional Trial Court Manila declaring Kim Liong Liong to have waived his right to crossexamine prosecution witness Antonio Dela Rama Dela Rama GR No L18606 December 26 1963 The Lawphil Project DATO ENG KIM LIONG ALCOM ALCOM GROUP BERHAD I3investor He has over thirty 30 years experience in property investment and mechanical and electrical trades He is the cofounder of SCLand Sdn Bhd a property investment and development company with projects in Klang Valley Selangor Pahang and Sabah choerry The case involves Kim Liong as the petitioner and the People of the Philippines as the respondent The events leading to this case began with an Information filed on January 28 2002 charging Liong with estafa for allegedly failing to return a total of US5095570 that was mistakenly deposited into his dollar account at Equitable PCI Bank JUNE 2018 PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE The Lawphil Project Kim Liong vs People of the Philippines GR No 200678 June 4 2018 Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank vs Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and the Monetary Board GR No 206331 June 4 2018 Department of Agrarian Reform MultiPurpose Cooperative DARMPC vs Carmencita Diaz The Lawphil Project Arellano Law Foundation Inc 3 KIM LIONG v PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES GR NO 200630 JUNE 04 2018 FACTS Liong was arraigned on January 20 2003 pleading not guilty to the chargeThe pretrial conference was terminated on July 13 2004 The initial presentation of the prosecutions evidence was set on December 19 2005 Alcom Group Berhad Announces the Resignation of Dato Eng Kim GR No 200630 The Lawphil Project Jan 3 2023 Alcom Group Berhad announced the resignation of Dato Eng Kim Liong aged 58 as executive director of the company with effect from December 31 2022 Reason To pursue his other interests Alcom Confirms The Resignation Of Executive Director Dato Eng KIM LIONG v PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES Sep 4 2022 Thus the Supreme Court accordingly discussed in Kim Liong v People of the Philippines GR 200630 4 June 2018 how protected the right of crossexamination is and its import The fundamental rights of the accused are provided in Article III Section 14 of the Constitution With a first degree in Science Dr Chew Kim Liong also known as Dr Leon K L Chew extraordinarily became the first recipient of an earned PhD in Fine Art Research from Goldsmiths College awarded by the University of London UK He returned to Singapore in 1997 as an art professor at the Nanyang Technological University Liong vs People MyLegalWhiz Crossexamination when forfeitable Daily Tribune GR No 200630 June 04 2018 KIM LIONG Petitioner v GR No 241348 Concurring Opinion The Lawphil Project 6 Liong vs People Free download as Word Doc doc docx PDF File pdf Text File txt or read online for free This case involves a petitioner charged with estafa for failing to return money that was erroneously deposited in his bank account On July 25 1960 Dy Kim Liong filed a petition before the Court of First Instance of Manila praying that the birth certificate of his son Raynaldo Chan filed in the local civil registrar be corrected by writing therein the name Raynaldo Dy and that the name of Jose Chan appearing therein as the father of Raynaldo be changed to Dy Kim Liong Full Text and Summary of GR No 200630 Liong vs People This document is a Supreme Court decision regarding a case of estafa brought against Kim Liong The key facts are 1 Liong was accused of failing to return 5095570 that was erroneously deposited in his bank account 2 The direct examination of the prosecutions main witness Antonio Dela Rama took over a year to complete due to multiple resets 3 Liong was declared kode transfer bank sumsel babel to have waived his
lotfet
heo69
